
Prevalence of ‘Unacceptable’ UK Farming Practices
February 2025
“The British public is overwhelmingly opposed to a litany of common farming practices. Using our own nationally representative polling data, we discussed this widespread disapproval in our insight ‘Acceptability of UK Farming Practices’. In fact, every single farming practice presented to respondents was deemed unacceptable by a large majority.
Although all of these practices are considered common practice in the UK meat, dairy, and egg industries, exact prevalence rates are more difficult to come by. However, these rates are crucial, as they can help guide advocacy targets and strategies. Moreover, the public deserves this information, so that they may make informed decisions as consumers. – Elise Hankins, Social Researcher
Key Takeaways
- There is a massive disconnect between public values and current practice. A sweeping majority (75-96%) of the UK public opposes common animal farming practices, yet the practices continue.
- Gaps in the research remain. Various farming practices, like debeaking and teeth clipping, are acknowledged to be common, yet actual prevalence rates are unavailable — either because they are not public domain, or the practices may not be recorded to begin with.
- The dairy and beef industries have become increasingly intertwined. While historically considered ‘waste products’ and killed soon after birth, male dairy calves are now more often absorbed into the beef industry — today, 52% of the UK’s beef herd originally comes from the dairy industry.
- Many unacceptable practices exist to address the symptoms rather than the root cause. For example, tail biting is a common issue in the pig industry, an unnatural behaviour induced by the extreme stress and boredom pigs experience on factory farms. Rather than removing the conditions that induce tail biting to begin with, their tails are amputated.
- There is a high opportunity for change. Various unacceptable practices already have tractable, high-impact alternatives, such as the use of in-ovo sexing to address chick culling.
- Governments have a key role in aligning public values and current practice. We recommend a universal, mandatory animal welfare labelling scheme — which the UK government is already considering — so that consumers can understand the practices behind their products, make informed purchasing decisions, and steadily incentivise better practices across the industry.
- A plant-based transition is the best way forward. Consumers can ensure that ‘unacceptable’ farming practices had no role in their food choices by opting for plant-based foods. Animal farmers can also transition to plant production with assistance from initiatives such as the Transfarmation Project.


Cattle Farming Practices

Photo credit: Farmers Weekly
Removing calves’ horn buds with hot iron
UK public disapproval rating: 75.7%
Prevalence on UK Farms: 90% (3 million animals per year¹)
According to the RSPCA, 90% of UK herds in the beef industry are disbudded, meaning their horn buds are removed before they develop into horns. This painful procedure is most commonly carried out by applying a heated iron directly to the tissue. Dairy herds in the UK are likely disbudded at a similar rate, and perhaps even higher, as indicated by more general European trends. The UK specifically requires that farms administer anesthesia prior to disbudding calves with a hot iron². But it is unclear how closely this requirement is followed. What is more clear is that post-operative pain management is rare, even if anesthesia at the point of disbudding is administered. The vast majority of disbudding in the UK is performed by farm personnel (86% of farms) rather than veterinarians, but only 14% of farmers routinely use non-steroidal anti-inflammatory drugs (NSAIDs) to manage post-operative calf pain. Recent research indicates that calves may continue to experience pain up to three weeks post-disbudding. In fact, calves may actually experience pain for longer than this — three weeks was merely the cut-off point of the study.
But why this at all? Calves are disbudded because horned cattle are more difficult, costly, or dangerous to manage. For example, horned cattle need more space, meaning less cattle can be raised or transported at once, resulting in higher costs. Apart from the danger they can pose to farmers, horned cattle may also present a risk to their fellow herdmates. Harming their herdmates is not just a welfare concern; it reduces profitability, as bruised meat must be trimmed away, and damaged hides fetch a lower price. However, there are alternatives to disbudding (and dehorning, the removal of developed horns). For one, farmers can use polled breeds, cattle which are naturally hornless. They can also update and improve farming conditions to mitigate the risks of horns. This means ditching the factory farming model — keeping less animals, allotting them more space, and ensuring the infrastructure is in place to protect farmers and cattle alike.

An example of a Burdizzo (castration pincers), photo source: Future Beef
Castration of newborn calves by testicle crushing
UK public disapproval rating: 73.8%
Prevalence on UK farms: Exact data not found
Newborn calves are castrated by various means, including using a rubber ring, a Burdizzo, or surgically removing the testes. The rubber ring method involves placing a tight rubber band around the scrotum, cutting off the blood supply and eventually resulting in the testes atrophying and dropping off. The Burdizzo method involves using a metal clamping tool to crush the spermatic cords. Surgical castration involves slitting open the scrotum to reveal the testes, which are then removed by twisting, pulling, or the use of a tool called an emasculator. These measures — including surgical castration — do not need to be carried out by a veterinarian unless the calf is over 2 months old. Pain relief — including anaesthesia at the point of castration — is also optional before 2 months of age. This means that pain relief is usually not given. While we have been unable to locate an exact prevalence rate, it is widely acknowledged that calf castration is standard practice, meaning virtually all male calves undergo the procedure.

Photo credit: Compassion in World Farming
Killing newborn male calves as they cannot produce milk
UK public disapproval rating: 79.6%
Prevalence on UK farms: 17.7% (79,492 animals per year³)
Male dairy calves have historically been considered a waste product, as they cannot produce milk, and were also unsuitable for beef production — resulting in their slaughter soon after birth. However, the tide is turning. In 2022, a total of 33,451 male calves under two months old were killed on-farm, and another 46,041 were sent to slaughterhouses⁴ (likely for European export or cheap kebabs, given the newly growing calf trade). This represents a somewhat small proportion (17.7%) of all male calves born into the dairy industry. In 2022, there were about 1.85 million dairy cows of calving age in the UK. Assuming each cow gives birth to a calf each year and about a quarter of these calves are male⁵, about 449,988 male calves were born that year. So, where were the majority of these calves sent?
Apart from the veal market — which is relatively small in the UK — it appears that male dairy calves are more commonly absorbed into the beef industry. For example, in 2023, almost half (43%) of slaughtered ‘prime’ cattle (aged 12–30 months) in the UK originally came from dairy herds. This figure does not include dairy cows (females) that are slaughtered for meat after their milk production drops and they are no longer profitable — when these animals are included, 52% of cattle slaughtered for meat originally come from the dairy industry.
This highlights how deeply intertwined the dairy and beef industries have become, further emphasising that the dairy industry is indeed a slaughter industry — whether male calves are killed on-site soon after birth, in slaughterhouses for export or local veal, or within the beef industry at 1 to 2.5 years old. In addition, almost all dairy cows are also sent to slaughter after they stop producing milk.
Pig Farming Practices

Photo credit: We Animals Media
Cutting tails of newborn piglets
UK public disapproval rating: 74.9%
Prevalence on UK farms: 71-95% (6.4–8.6 million animals per year⁶)
Newborn piglets are subjected to tail docking, the cutting off of a portion of their tails, on the vast majority of UK farms. They undergo this procedure despite routine tail docking being banned in the UK since 2006. In fact, current estimates indicate that 71-85% of pigs in the UK undergo tail docking, with some estimates ranging as high as 95%. Moreover, this painful procedure is typically carried out without anaesthesia or analgesia, leaving piglets to experience the amputation and recovery period without pain relief. Piglets are subjected to this practice to reduce later rates of tail biting and cannibalism — unnatural behaviours that arise from the extreme stress pigs experience within industrialised farming. This is a clear case of the symptoms being addressed rather than the root cause: factory farming.

Photo credit: Conservative Animal Welfare Foundation
Keeping pigs in tight cages where they cannot turn around for weeks
UK public disapproval rating: 96.2%
Prevalence on UK farms: 60% of sows (205,261 animals per year⁷)
The majority of mother pigs (sows) are confined in farrowing crates, cages so small that they cannot turn around, for weeks at a time. Their confinement in these crates amounts to 22% of their adult lives. In the UK today 60% of sows are still confined in farrowing crates. These crates are justified by the industry as an animal welfare measure, intended to reduce incidences of piglet ‘crushing’ by the sow. However, farrowing crates are not guaranteed to reduce piglet mortality, and this analysis ignores the welfare of the sow. Other countries have banned the use of farrowing crates outright — Sweden in 1988, Norway in 2000, and Switzerland in 2007 — without increasing piglet deaths. For example, in Switzerland, piglet mortality has not changed since the ban went into effect and stands at 11.1%. Meanwhile, in the UK, this figure is worse at 12.1%.

Photo credit: We Animals Media
Cutting or grinding of teeth in newborn piglets
UK public disapproval rating: 75.8%
Prevalence on UK farms: Exact data not found
Piglets are born with sharp teeth. These teeth enable them to fight for access to a teat, as sows do not necessarily have enough milk or teats available to feed each piglet — especially as sows are bred to birth larger and larger litters. To mitigate damage to their fellow litter mates and avoid harming the sow while nursing, newborn piglets are commonly subjected to teeth grinding and clipping. This means their teeth are ground down or cut, without any forms of pain relief. Routine ‘teeth reduction’ is illegal in the UK, but recent investigations (for example, see here and here) have exposed farms carrying out routine teeth clipping. Despite exact figures being unavailable, the practice is widely acknowledged as commonplace.
Chicken Farming Practices

Photo credit: We Animals Media
Keeping chickens in cages about as tight as an A4 paper sheet
UK public disapproval rating: 94.1%
Prevalence on UK farms: 23% of egg-laying hens (11,268,823 animals per year⁸)
While battery cages are not permitted according to UK regulations, so-called ‘enriched’ cages are. These cages are larger, but packed with more birds, making the allotted space per bird similar to a battery cage. Nearly all (95%) of broiler (i.e. meat) chickens are confined in intensive indoor systems, with the majority of these being in barns rather than cages. However, these barns are not the barns you might imagine. ‘Barns’ in the broiler chicken industry are massive warehouses, usually containing 25,000–50,000 birds each (see photo). Additionally, according to the British Egg Industry Council, 23% of egg-laying hens are confined in cages. Another 13% are housed in barns. Much like the broiler industry, the ‘barns’ for egg-laying hens (called ‘percheries’) are no more than sheds or warehouses, typically housing around 6,000 birds each. Even in barns, these hens are allotted little space or enrichment. Only one nest is required per seven hens. In fact, if group nests are used, only one square meter of nesting space is required for every 120 hens.

Photo credit: We Animals Media
Killing newborn chicks with CO2 gassing or meat-grinders
UK public disapproval rating: 84.5%
Prevalence on UK farms: 100% of males in the egg industry (40–45 million animals per year)
Millions of newborn male chicks in the UK are slaughtered each year, as they are considered a waste product of the egg industry. Annual estimates range from 40 to 45 million chicks, the majority of which are gassed with argon (though other methods like maceration and CO2 gassing are also permitted). However, this practice is entirely unnecessary, even without a plant-based revolution to the food system. This is because in-ovo sexing is a feasible alternative — that is, determining the sex of an embryo at an early stage of development and terminating them before hatching. Moreover, the practice was recently recommended by the UK government’s Animal Welfare Committee after investigating the commercial readiness of the practice for the UK market and the resulting impact on animal welfare. However, it has not yet been implemented in the UK, meaning about half of all the chicks born into the egg industry today are immediately culled.

Photo credit: We Animals Media
Cutting off beaks of newborn chicks
UK public disapproval rating: 86.8%
Prevalence on UK farms: Exact data not found
Due to the unnatural and cramped conditions on factory farms, chickens may engage in feather pecking and even cannibalism. To avoid this, chicks in the egg industry often undergo beak trimming, or debeaking, via an infrared beam that removes up to a third of their upper and lower beak. Broiler chicks can also be debeaked, but because broiler chickens are killed so early into their life, the practice is deemed less necessary and thus is less common. With the sharp tips of their beaks removed, chickens may inflict less damage on their fellow flock mates. This is how debeaking is justified in the industry. However, this practice treats the symptom rather than the disease: factory farming. If they were not driven to aggression by intensive and crowded conditions on factory farms, such a practice would not be necessary.
The practice undoubtedly violates hen welfare. The beak is a complex and sensitive organ that serves functional and social roles. Beak trimming is a painful procedure, and one that also permanently inhibits the bird’s ability to engage in normal tasks, such as preening and picking up food. For an in-depth look at beak trimming, its consequences, and its alternatives, we recommend reading this report.
Conclusion and Future Directions
The UK permits farming practices that the British public finds widely unacceptable. But higher welfare alternatives exist, if only the industries would adopt them. This is made no clearer than in the case of chick culling, where (1) a sweeping majority of the public finds the practice unacceptable and (2) in-ovo sexing is a viable alternative already vetted by the UK government’s own Animal Welfare Committee. Adopting in-ovo sexing across the UK would have a massive impact. All male chicks born into the egg industry are currently killed, but it could be brought down to 0%. Given the high rate of public disapproval, a tractable available alternative, and the scale of the issue, we highly recommend advocates focus on the issue of male chick culling.
The farming practices considered most unacceptable are crates and cages that keep animals confined in cramped conditions. Cages for chickens are deemed unacceptable by 94.1% of Britons, yet nearly a quarter of egg-laying hens are still subjected to them. Therefore, we encourage advocates to continue fighting for an end to cages, as the public strongly supports this move.
The most strongly disapproved of practice across respondents was confining pigs in crates so small that they are unable to turn around (96.2% disapproval rating). Yet, 60% of sows are still subjected to this practice. The UK government has previously indicated their interest in banning farrowing crates, but this consideration was dropped in 2021, with no new progress to date. We encourage advocates to continue to put pressure on the government to move forward a ban on farrowing crates, given the public’s near unanimous desire to see the practice expelled and the existence of higher welfare alternatives.
Moreover, we encourage greater support for farmers trying to adopt higher welfare practices or transition to plant production. Many unfavourable farming practices exist to address the symptoms of factory farming. Pigs and chickens cannibalise each other because they are kept in densely confined conditions that cause extreme stress and induce unnatural behaviours. In response, we clip their beaks and amputate their tails because we accept the farming model that creates these issues. But farmers trying to address the root cause rather than the symptoms need assistance. Higher welfare is expensive, and without support, farmers may not be able to make the transition. The UK government could also benefit from offering this type of assistance scheme — as more farmers adopt higher welfare measures, the UK’s international and local reputation will rise in tandem.
This is also where mandatory animal welfare labels come into play. The public finds common farming practices unacceptable and wants transparent welfare labels on their animal products. Universal, mandatory welfare labels would empower consumers to make informed choices that actually align with their values. Moreover, such a labeling system would reward farmers who implement higher welfare practices, as consumers would put their money where their mouth is, even if this means paying more. This buying pattern would then incentive further welfare improvements across the industry.
Of course, the highest welfare scenario is for farmers to fully transition away from animal agriculture, becoming plant producers instead. The Transfarmation Project by Mercy for Animals is one of the organisations facilitating this transition, and we encourage other organisations to join this type of initiative.
Footnotes
¹Calculated based on the number of calves born into the beef industry — including male dairy calves absorbed into the beef industry — in 2023 (1.94 million) plus the estimated number of female dairy calves born in 2023 (1.39 million, per our own calculations).
²However, the UK does not require anesthetic for chemical disbudding, a much less common method of disbudding that involves applying a caustic paste to the horn buds.
³Based on 2022 data.
⁴These calves were not sent to slaughter for the UK veal market, according to the government’s own reporting.
⁵Rather than assuming half of births are male, we estimate a more conservative ~25% based on the use of sexed semen, which reduces the rate of male births. In 2020, 51.3% of total semen sales were sexed semen. We use this rate to calculate that of the 1,848,000 dairy cows of calving age, 948,024 were inseminated with sexed semen, resulting in all-female births (i.e. no male calves). The remaining 899,976 cows are assumed to have birthed males 50% of the time, resulting in 449,988 male calves.
⁶Calculated based on the number of female breeding pigs in the UK in 2023 (338,000) x the average number of piglets weened per sow per year (26.75) = 9,041,500 piglets per year. We then calculated the lower estimate (9,041,500 x 71% = 6,419,465) and upper estimate (9,041,500 x 95% = 8,589,425).
⁷Based on 2022 data.
⁸Based on 2023 data. Other estimates stand even higher at 14 million.
